Open-secret voting
Edición de la obra Open-secret voting
| Autor | Adrian Vermeule |
|---|---|
| Editorial | Harvard Law School |
| Fecha de publicación | 2010 |
| Lugar | Cambridge, MA |
| Idioma | inglés |
| Formato | Electronic resource |
| LCCN | 2010655617 |
| Serie | Discussion paper -- no. 674 · Discussion paper (John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business : Online) -- no. 674. |
| Número de Cutter | V524o |
"Abstract: Stock debates about transparency and secrecy usually assume that open voting and secret voting are mutually exclusive. But these positions present a false alternative; open and secret voting can be employed as complements in a larger decision-procedure. In what follows I will propose a hybrid or dual procedure of open-secret voting, and attempt to specify the conditions under which that procedure works well. I suggest that open-secret voting can best be justified as an institutional means of obtaining a second opinion from the voting group. A second opinion of this sort might produce informational benefits either for the members of the voting group itself, for outsideparties, or for both. (This is a companion paper to Adrian Vermeule, "Second Opinions" available on SSRN)---John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business web site.